Consent, capacity and power differences develops how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed. Students examine influences and evidence, rehearse a safe respectful strategy, make a realistic plan with support, try or analyse it and reflect on consequences for self and others.
Example
A strong response to consent, capacity and power differences respects consent and difference, reduces avoidable risk, names trustworthy support and avoids pretending that a classroom activity replaces qualified care.
Key terms
Capacity:
A key health or movement concept in Consent, capacity and power differences.
Power imbalance:
A practical influence or strategy relevant to Consent, capacity and power differences.
Coercion:
A planning or reflection idea used in Consent, capacity and power differences.
Questions
1. What is the central idea in consent, capacity and power differences?
how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed
Follow pressure without checking safety or consent.
Assume one strategy suits every person.
Keep serious safety or wellbeing concerns secret from trusted support.
2. Which term means "A key health or movement concept in Consent, capacity and power differences."?
Capacity
Power imbalance
Coercion
Context
3. Which term means "A practical influence or strategy relevant to Consent, capacity and power differences."?
Power imbalance
Capacity
Coercion
Evidence
4. Which term means "A planning or reflection idea used in Consent, capacity and power differences."?
Coercion
Capacity
Power imbalance
Reflection
5. Which task best practises consent, capacity and power differences?
Analyse scenarios and practise stopping when consent is unclear.
Follow pressure without checking safety or consent.
Assume one strategy suits every person.
Keep serious safety or wellbeing concerns secret from trusted support.
6. Which approach best supports learning in Health & PE?
Use reliable information, communicate respectfully, choose a safe strategy, plan support and reflect on real effects.
Follow pressure without checking safety or consent.
Assume one strategy suits every person.
Keep serious safety or wellbeing concerns secret from trusted support.
7. Why is a worked example useful?
It makes the reasoning and deliberate choices visible.
It removes the need to think.
It guarantees every new problem is identical.
It replaces practice completely.
8. Which response applies how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed?
Analyse scenarios and practise stopping when consent is unclear.
Follow pressure without checking safety or consent.
Assume one strategy suits every person.
Keep serious safety or wellbeing concerns secret from trusted support.
9. What makes guided practice useful?
It gives support while the learner tries the thinking for themselves.
It supplies answers before any attempt.
It avoids feedback and reflection.
It makes the final check unrelated.
10. How should the key terms support consent, capacity and power differences?
They should make the explanation more precise and connected to evidence.
They should be listed without meaning.
They should replace examples.
They should be used only for spelling.
11. What is the best response when a first attempt is incomplete?
Use feedback or evidence to revise the reasoning.
Hide the attempt.
Repeat it without checking.
Choose an unrelated answer.
12. Which explanation is strongest?
A clear idea supported by a relevant example and reasoning.
A claim with no support.
A copied definition only.
A long response that avoids the question.
13. Why transfer the skill to a new example?
It shows whether the understanding can be used beyond the worked model.
It proves all examples are identical.
It makes the original lesson unnecessary.
It prevents reflection.
14. What should a checkpoint reveal?
Whether the learner is ready for the final check or needs another explanation.
Only whether the learner worked quickly.
Whether the topic title was memorised.
Nothing about understanding.
15. What makes a conclusion responsible?
It matches the evidence and acknowledges important limits.
It claims more than the evidence shows.
It ignores alternatives.
It is decided before the task.
16. How can consent, capacity and power differences support independent learning?
It gives a repeatable way to interpret, create, solve or evaluate a new situation.
It works only for the example already shown.
It removes the need for judgement.
It depends on guessing.
17. What should happen when evidence challenges the first interpretation or method?
Review the reasoning and revise it when the evidence warrants change.
Discard the evidence automatically.
Keep the first answer regardless.
Stop checking the work.
18. Which reflection leads to useful improvement?
Identify a successful choice, evidence of its effect and one specific next step.
State only that the task was easy or hard.
List the title again.
Avoid referring to the work.
19. What distinguishes strong Year 10 Health & PE work?
Accurate knowledge, deliberate choices, evidence and clear reasoning.
Length without relevance.
Confidence without checking.
Memorisation without application.
20. Why should an application task remain manageable but substantial?
It should provide enough challenge to demonstrate real learning without creating unnecessary overload.
It should remove all challenge.
It should be long regardless of purpose.
It should repeat the quiz word for word.
21. What is the strongest outcome from consent, capacity and power differences?
Use how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed accurately in a purposeful new context.
Follow pressure without checking safety or consent.
Assume one strategy suits every person.
Keep serious safety or wellbeing concerns secret from trusted support.
Answer key (parent copy)
1. how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed
2. Capacity
3. Power imbalance
4. Coercion
5. Analyse scenarios and practise stopping when consent is unclear.
6. Use reliable information, communicate respectfully, choose a safe strategy, plan support and reflect on real effects.
7. It makes the reasoning and deliberate choices visible.
8. Analyse scenarios and practise stopping when consent is unclear.
9. It gives support while the learner tries the thinking for themselves.
10. They should make the explanation more precise and connected to evidence.
11. Use feedback or evidence to revise the reasoning.
12. A clear idea supported by a relevant example and reasoning.
13. It shows whether the understanding can be used beyond the worked model.
14. Whether the learner is ready for the final check or needs another explanation.
15. It matches the evidence and acknowledges important limits.
16. It gives a repeatable way to interpret, create, solve or evaluate a new situation.
17. Review the reasoning and revise it when the evidence warrants change.
18. Identify a successful choice, evidence of its effect and one specific next step.
19. Accurate knowledge, deliberate choices, evidence and clear reasoning.
20. It should provide enough challenge to demonstrate real learning without creating unnecessary overload.
21. Use how power and capacity affect whether agreement is free and informed accurately in a purposeful new context.