These worksheets are free forever. Want lessons that adapt to your child as they learn, plus progress tracking? Try Ignition Learning free.

Sign up free

Ignition Learning — Activity Sheet

Solutions, solubility and concentration

Science · Year 8

Name: ______________________Date: ____________

A solution forms when a solute disperses through a solvent. Solubility is the maximum amount that can dissolve under particular conditions, while concentration describes how much solute is present in a given amount of solution. Dissolving does not make matter vanish.

Example

Adding twice as much cordial concentrate to the same volume of water creates a more concentrated solution, provided the added substances mix fully.

Key terms

Solute:
The substance dissolved in a solution.
Solvent:
The substance that dissolves the solute.
Solubility:
The maximum amount of solute that dissolves under stated conditions.

Questions

  1. 1. Which statement best captures solutions, solubility and concentration?

    • Solution concentration and solubility describe different aspects of how solute particles disperse in a solvent.
    • A dissolved solute has disappeared and no longer contributes mass.
    • The pattern can only be explained by guessing.
    • The topic has no observable evidence.
  2. 2. Which term means "The substance dissolved in a solution."?

    • Solute
    • Solvent
    • Solubility
    • Variable
  3. 3. Which term means "The substance that dissolves the solute."?

    • Solvent
    • Solute
    • Solubility
    • Conclusion
  4. 4. Which term means "The maximum amount of solute that dissolves under stated conditions."?

    • Solubility
    • Solute
    • Solvent
    • Prediction
  5. 5. Which observation task is most relevant to this topic?

    • Compare the colour intensity of several safe food-colouring solutions made with different amounts of colouring.
    • Copy the topic title without looking at an example.
    • Choose a result before making observations.
    • Ignore details that do not match a first guess.
  6. 6. Which model would best represent the key process or relationship?

    • Draw equal-volume particle diagrams for dilute, concentrated and saturated solutions.
    • A decorative drawing with no labels or connection to evidence.
    • A list of unrelated facts.
    • A model that deliberately contradicts every observation.
  7. 7. Which investigation is focused most directly on the scientific idea?

    • Test how many equal spoonfuls of sugar dissolve in equal volumes of cool and warm water, using safe temperatures.
    • Change many uncontrolled factors and record nothing.
    • Ask only for opinions and treat them as measurements.
    • Repeat a memorised answer without testing it.
  8. 8. Which evidence best supports the lesson explanation?

    • Recovering crystals by evaporation shows that dissolved solute remained present in the solution.
    • A dissolved solute has disappeared and no longer contributes mass.
    • One preferred answer with no observation.
    • A claim that cannot be checked in any way.
  9. 9. Which task applies the science in a new context?

    • Explain why medicine and cleaning-product instructions specify concentration or dilution.
    • Write the heading again without explaining it.
    • Ignore the system and choose randomly.
    • Assume the same answer fits every situation.
  10. 10. Which response best corrects the misconception in this topic?

    • Solution concentration and solubility describe different aspects of how solute particles disperse in a solvent.
    • A dissolved solute has disappeared and no longer contributes mass.
    • Both statements must be equally correct.
    • Evidence cannot help decide between explanations.
  11. 11. What makes a scientific observation useful?

    • It records relevant details without changing them to fit an expectation.
    • It includes only details that support a preferred answer.
    • It replaces measurements with guesses.
    • It hides the conditions under which it was made.
  12. 12. Why should a scientific model include its limitations?

    • Models simplify reality, so users need to know what the representation leaves out.
    • A limitation proves the model has no value.
    • Models are exact copies and never omit anything.
    • Limitations should be hidden so a model looks certain.
  13. 13. What makes a comparative investigation fair?

    • Change or compare the intended factor while keeping other relevant conditions consistent.
    • Change every condition at the same time.
    • Measure only the result that looks best.
    • Decide the conclusion before collecting data.
  14. 14. Why repeat measurements or use several samples?

    • To reveal variation and reduce the influence of chance or one unusual result.
    • To guarantee a preferred conclusion.
    • To make units unnecessary.
    • To remove the need for a clear method.
  15. 15. What is the best response to an anomalous result?

    • Record it, check the method and investigate whether it is error or meaningful variation.
    • Delete it automatically.
    • Delete all other results instead.
    • Assume it proves the whole topic wrong.
  16. 16. Which conclusion is scientifically responsible?

    • One that answers the question, uses the evidence and states important limits.
    • One that claims more than the data show.
    • One that ignores conflicting evidence.
    • One based only on the expected answer.
  17. 17. What would make the claim about solutions, solubility and concentration stronger?

    • Several relevant, repeatable evidence lines that agree with the explanation.
    • A larger heading and no new evidence.
    • Removing results that are inconvenient.
    • Relying on a single uncheckable opinion.
  18. 18. What should happen if reliable new evidence conflicts with a model?

    • The model should be reviewed and revised or replaced if needed.
    • The evidence should always be hidden.
    • The original model must never change.
    • Scientists should stop asking questions.
  19. 19. How should safety and ethics shape an investigation?

    • Risks, people, living things and environments should be considered before the method is used.
    • Safety matters only after data collection.
    • Any method is acceptable if it is fast.
    • Ethics has no place in science.
  20. 20. What makes science communication trustworthy?

    • Clear methods, accurate terms, relevant evidence and acknowledgement of uncertainty.
    • Certainty without evidence.
    • Leaving out how results were obtained.
    • Using dramatic language instead of data.
  21. 21. What is the strongest overall outcome from studying solutions, solubility and concentration?

    • Use observations, models, investigations and evidence to explain and apply this idea.
    • Memorise the title without using it.
    • Avoid testing explanations.
    • Treat every first idea as permanently correct.

Answer key (parent copy)

  1. 1. Solution concentration and solubility describe different aspects of how solute particles disperse in a solvent.
  2. 2. Solute
  3. 3. Solvent
  4. 4. Solubility
  5. 5. Compare the colour intensity of several safe food-colouring solutions made with different amounts of colouring.
  6. 6. Draw equal-volume particle diagrams for dilute, concentrated and saturated solutions.
  7. 7. Test how many equal spoonfuls of sugar dissolve in equal volumes of cool and warm water, using safe temperatures.
  8. 8. Recovering crystals by evaporation shows that dissolved solute remained present in the solution.
  9. 9. Explain why medicine and cleaning-product instructions specify concentration or dilution.
  10. 10. Solution concentration and solubility describe different aspects of how solute particles disperse in a solvent.
  11. 11. It records relevant details without changing them to fit an expectation.
  12. 12. Models simplify reality, so users need to know what the representation leaves out.
  13. 13. Change or compare the intended factor while keeping other relevant conditions consistent.
  14. 14. To reveal variation and reduce the influence of chance or one unusual result.
  15. 15. Record it, check the method and investigate whether it is error or meaningful variation.
  16. 16. One that answers the question, uses the evidence and states important limits.
  17. 17. Several relevant, repeatable evidence lines that agree with the explanation.
  18. 18. The model should be reviewed and revised or replaced if needed.
  19. 19. Risks, people, living things and environments should be considered before the method is used.
  20. 20. Clear methods, accurate terms, relevant evidence and acknowledgement of uncertainty.
  21. 21. Use observations, models, investigations and evidence to explain and apply this idea.